![]() ![]() Of Bengal could share the land with a common cosmology and a common devotion, an innovative speculation that is subjunctive One example each from the 16th, 17th, and 18thĬenturies will illustrate the novel strategies as authors tried to imagine a world wherein the multiple religious traditions Widely, prompting numerous attempts to reconcile Hindu and Muslim theologies. ![]() Though Satya Pīr was only a fictional character, his tales circulated United in finding a common solution to the decline. In this new form of devotion, Vaiṣṇavas and Sufis were Vaiṣṇava and Sufi ideals-arrogated to himself that now-vacated rôle. To run counter to the successful implementation of the yugāvatāra’s mission until Satya Pīr-a figure with allegiance to both ![]() With Mughal ascendancy, the political landscape seemed Kṛṣṇa, embodied in Caitanya as the androgyne. Martial forms quickly yielded to more comforting and benign images of divinity that ultimately emphasised the erotic sentiment When Vaiṣṇavas in 16th century Bengal first recognised Kṛṣṇa Caitanya (1486–1533) as divine, they attributed to him all theįorms of the purāṇic Kṛṣṇa, starting with the yugāvatāra as the corrective for the ills of the Kali age. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |